Settlement Reached in GC Services Call Center Overtime Lawsuit

06.14.2012

The law firms of Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP and Weinhaus & Potashnick filed a class and collective action lawsuit seeking unpaid regular and overtime wages on behalf of call center employees who primarily work on the telephones speaking with customers. These employees worked in call center facilities located across the country and operated by GC Services Limited Partnership.

The lawsuit alleged that GC Services consistently violated federal and state wage and hour laws by failing to pay its call center employees all earned wages and overtime and by failing to accurately record all time worked pre-shift and post-shift and over their unpaid lunch breaks. Examples of the alleged unlawful practices include requiring employees to work "off-the-clock" by not paying for pre-shift work such as booting up and logging in to computer terminals, accessing a variety of computer applications and programs, skip tracing, as well as other tasks integral and indispensable to their primary job duties. The lawsuit was brought under federal law, the Fair Labor Standards Act, and is on behalf of all current and former GC Services call center employees who are or were paid hourly at any GC Services facility across the United States.

The United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri certified the case as a collective action and notice was sent to all eligible employees informing them of their right to join. The period the case closed on June 1, 2011. Plaintiffs also filed a motion to certify the case as a class action under California law in the spring of 2011.

In the fall of 2011, the Parties reached an agreement to settle both the Missouri FLSA action and the California Rule 23 class action. The Western District of Missouri Court approved the FLSA settlement and funds have been distributed to the individuals who opted-in to the lawsuit. After holding a Final Fairness Hearing, the California Rule 23 class action settlement was approved in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Settlement funds will be distributed to eligible California class members in July.

Jump to Page

Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP Cookie Preference Center

Your Privacy

When you visit our website, we use cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences, or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. For more information about how we use Cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. These cookies may only be disabled by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Functional Cookies

Always Active

Some functions of the site require remembering user choices, for example your cookie preference, or keyword search highlighting. These do not store any personal information.

Form Submissions

Always Active

When submitting your data, for example on a contact form or event registration, a cookie might be used to monitor the state of your submission across pages.

Performance Cookies

Performance cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.

Powered by Firmseek