SSH Obtains Nation's First Certification of Class in a Walker Process Claim

On May 14, 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, the nation’s first certification of a class in a Walker Process case.  A Walker Process claim is one predicated on defendant’s use of a fraudulently obtained patent to obtain or attempt to obtain monopoly power, named after the Supreme Court case, Walker Process Equip. Inc. v. Food Mach. & Chem Corp., 382 U.S. 172 (1965).  A class of direct purchases of SanDisk flash memory products sued SanDisk for monopolization, among other claims, based on patents SanDisk fraudulently obtained, which patents were so critical that SanDisk referred to them as its “crown jewel” patents.  

Click here to read the Order.

In rejecting each of SanDisk’s arguments against certification and its Daubert challenge of Plaintiffs’ expert, the Court found "that Plaintiffs have demonstrated that the  superiority and predominance requirements of Rule 23(b)(3)have been met.  Plaintiffs have shown the superiority of maintaining a class action and that questions of law and fact common to the proposed class predominance over any questions affecting only individual members."

Plaintiffs are represented by SSH attorneys Norm Siegel, Jason Hartley and Ryan O’Dell and are co-lead counsel in the case. 

  • Our pick for bet-the-company litigation

    - CEO, Heartland Spine & Specialty Hospital
  • Stueve Siegel Hanson 'beats the big guys in court'

    - Modern Healthcare covering SSH landmark anti-trust case
  • Big firm lawyers, small firm service.

    – President – Overlap, Inc.
  • Best of the Bar

    – Kansas City Business Journal
  • One of the best plaintiff’s lawyers in the country.

    – Lawdragon Magazine

Contact Us



  • Benchmark Plaintiff

    Benchmark Plaintiff

  • Commercial Litigation

    Commercial Litigation

  • Super Lawyers 2017

    Super Lawyers 2017

  • American Association for Justice

    American Association for Justice

  • Best Lawyers

    Best Lawyers

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.