$25 Million In Settlements Reached in Antitrust Price Fixing Case

Stueve Siegel Hanson LLP, together with its co-lead counsel Heins, Mills and Olson P.L.C. reached a settlement agreement of $16 million, before deduction of Taiwan taxes, with the Tong Yang defendants in a nationwide antitrust class action regarding price fixing of aftermarket automotive sheet metal parts, such as fenders, hoods and floor panels.  The case, brought on behalf of a class of direct purchasers in the United States, is pending in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Fond du Lac Bumper Exchange Inc. v. Jui Li Enterprise Co. Ltd., et al., 2:09-cv-00852 (E.D. Wis.).

A second settlement was reached in May 2015 with Taiwanese auto parts maker Gordon Auto Body Parts Co. Ltd. The defendant has agreed to pay $9 million to direct purchasers of certain aftermarket auto parts.  This brings the total settlements in this litigation to $25 million.

This litigation is the consolidation of several lawsuits and the claims of direct purchasers of the automotive sheet metal products in the United States.  The Court appointed Stueve Siegel Hanson partner Jason Hartley co-lead Counsel in 2010.

  • Our pick for bet-the-company litigation

    - CEO, Heartland Spine & Specialty Hospital
  • Stueve Siegel Hanson 'beats the big guys in court'

    - Modern Healthcare covering SSH landmark anti-trust case
  • Big firm lawyers, small firm service.

    – President – Overlap, Inc.
  • Best of the Bar

    – Kansas City Business Journal
  • One of the best plaintiff’s lawyers in the country.

    – Lawdragon Magazine

Contact Us

success

AWARDS & RECOGNITION

  • Benchmark Plaintiff

    Benchmark Plaintiff

  • Commercial Litigation

    Commercial Litigation

  • Super Lawyers 2015

    Super Lawyers 2015

  • Best Lawyers

    Best Lawyers

The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for advice regarding your individual situation. We invite you to contact us and welcome your calls, letters and electronic mail. Contacting us does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not send any confidential information to us until such time as an attorney-client relationship has been established.

The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.